Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210713›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

A post-hoc analysis of intravitreal aflibercept-treated nAMD patients from ARIES & ALTAIR: predicting treatment intervals and frequency for aflibercept treat-and-extend therapy regimen using machine learning.

Matthias Gutfleisch, Britta Heimes-Bussmann, Sökmen Aydin, Ratko Petrovic, Alexander Loktyushin, Masahito Ohji, Kanji Takahashi, Annabelle A Okada, Paula Scholz, Hossam Youssef and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Matthias GutfleischDepartment of Ophthalmology, St Franziskus-Hospital, Münster, Germany. matthias.gutfleisch@augen-franziskus.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-5838
Britta Heimes-BussmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, St Franziskus-Hospital, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3898-1679
Sökmen AydinM3 Macula Monitor Münster GmbH & Co KG, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-7517
Ratko Petrovicdeepeye Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1905-1958
Alexander Loktyushindeepeye Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-9124
Masahito OhjiShiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-Cho, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1565-8289
Kanji TakahashiSchool of Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata City, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-5625
Annabelle A OkadaSchool of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka-Shi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-8962
Paula ScholzBayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-0566
Hossam YoussefBayer Middle East FZE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8876-8038
Ulrike Bauer-SteinhusenBayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4998-9035
Tobias MachewitzBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6844-4243
Kai RothausDepartment of Ophthalmology, St Franziskus-Hospital, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-8795
Albrecht LommatzschDepartment of Ophthalmology, St Franziskus-Hospital, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9640-4103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo predict potential treatment need during treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using an artificial intelligence (AI) model trained using transfer learning.

methodsARIES and ALTAIR were randomized controlled Phase 3b/4 trials assessing intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with nAMD. Following treatment initiation with three monthly injections of IVT-AFL, treatment intervals were re-assessed continuously during the study based on prespecified criteria. In this post- hoc analysis, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans from Week (Wk) 8 and Wk 16 visits from patients treated with T&E regimens of 2 mg IVT-AFL over 2 years were utilized to predict individual treatment intervals and frequency. Automated image segmentation of the SD-OCT scans was performed, predictive models of treatment intervals and frequency were developed using machine learning or logistic regression methods, and their performance was evaluated using a fivefold cross-validation. A transfer learning technique was used to adapt existing AI models previously trained on a pro-re-nata therapy regimen to the T&E dataset.

resultsIn total, 205 ARIES and 112 ALTAIR patient datasets were used for training and evaluation. The following results were achieved with an AI model trained using transfer learning (for ARIES) and logistic regression (for ALTAIR). For prediction of the first treatment interval (short [< 12 weeks] or long [≥ 12 weeks]) following treatment initiation, at Visit 4 (Wk 16), the AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.87 and 0.78 for ARIES and ALTAIR, respectively. For assessment of the individual frequency of IVT-AFL in the first and second study years, the model achieved an AUC of 0.84 and 0.79, respectively, for ARIES, and 0.79 and 0.78, respectively, for ALTAIR. For prediction of the last intended individual treatment interval at the end of Year 2, the AI model achieved an AUC of 0.74 and 0.77 for ARIES and ALTAIR, respectively.

conclusionAI trained using transfer learning can be used to predict potential treatment needs for anti-VEGF treatment in nAMD based on SD-OCT scans at Wk 8 and Wk 16, supporting medical decisions on interval adjustments and optimizing individualized IVT-AFL treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Machine LearningReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVisual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMaleROC CurveafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGF therapyArtificial intelligenceNeovascular age-related macular degenerationTransfer learningTreat-and-extend

Identifiers

PMID40210713
PMCPMC12373702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.