Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210708›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2025

The global resistance problem and the clinical antibacterial pipeline.

Ursula Theuretzbacher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Drug-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From lipophilicity windows to decision-grade antibacterial design: the next translational step for coumarin amphiphiles.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bacterial cell envelope-targeting antibiotics.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. [New antimicrobial substances to combat increasing resistance].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cross-species transmission ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ursula TheuretzbacherCenter for Anti-Infective Agents, Vienna, Austria. utheuretzbacher@cefaia.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-7128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of the clinical antibacterial pipeline demonstrates that there is a limited range of strategies that are primarily focused on modified versions of widely used chemical classes. These modifications aim to circumvent class-specific resistance mechanisms and reduce resistance rates in certain multidrug-resistant pathogens. Owing to the great variation in resistance rates and mechanisms, the clinical success of current approaches varies substantially across different countries, regions, and economic and environmental conditions, which affects the global societal value of these antibiotics that remain vulnerable to cross-resistance. Although there has been some progress in developing urgently needed antibiotics with novel targets and chemical structures, some of which have advanced to phase I/II trials, further breakthroughs are required. Additionally, adjunctive agents designed to enhance the outcome of conventional antibiotic therapies, along with bacteriophages that offer targeted and personalized treatments, are also under investigation. However, the potential of adjunctive therapeutics, such as antivirulence agents, and bacteriophages has yet to be realized in terms of feasibility and global societal impact.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialBacteriophagesDrug DiscoveryHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.