Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210687›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Defining the student perspective on radiation oncology-an analysis of factors influencing medical students' decisions for specialized training.

Stefan Gravemeyer, Dogus Darici, David Rene Steike, Martina Schmitz, Hans Th Eich, Michael Oertel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Shaping the future of radiation oncology education: results of a nationwide student survey from Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan GravemeyerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University hospital of Munster, Munster, Germany. stefan.gravemeyer@ukmuenster.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-0430
Dogus DariciInstitute for Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Munster, Munster, Germany.
David Rene SteikeDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University hospital of Munster, Munster, Germany.
Martina SchmitzInstitute for Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Munster, Munster, Germany.
Hans Th EichDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University hospital of Munster, Munster, Germany.
Michael OertelDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University hospital of Munster, Munster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe new Medical Licensing Regulations 2025 in Germany demand a longitudinal and interdisciplinary oncological curriculum for the future of medical education. Small disciplines like radiation oncology (RO) tend to be underrepresented in the general curriculum, which complicates attracting new residents and doctoral candidates to the field. To bridge this gap, our university successfully implemented a multidisciplinary training for preclinical semesters combining anatomical and RO knowledge. The following study addresses students' perceptions of RO and learning success in the setting of a mandatory preclinical course.

methodsA quantitative single-center cross-sectional study with 106 students was conducted via online questionnaire before and after a 1-week semester course in anatomy and RO. The analysis was conceptualized using descriptive statistical methods and the expectancy-value model according to Eccles and Wigfield.

resultsOverall, 106 (73 female, 33 male) students with a mean age of 21.8 years took part in the first survey. Advanced courses during finals and gender had no effect on interest in RO. However, it could be shown that the understanding of RO (p < 0.0001), knowledge about patients who need to be referred to RO (p < 0.0001), and the interest in specialty training in RO (p < 0.0001) significantly increased during the course. The students' perceptions of specialty training in RO remained stable before and after the course.

conclusionThis is the first study on the influence factors for students' decisions to pursue a specialized training in RO. Students' expectations regarding a good specialty training are well represented in RO, and the implementation of preclinical courses significantly increases the knowledge about RO and the level of interest regarding a specialty training in RO.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceRadiation OncologyStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCareerMedical schoolRadiotherapyStudents’ opinion

Identifiers

PMID40210687
PMCPMC12181201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.