Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210680›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2025

A redefined InDel taxonomy provides insights into mutational signatures.

Gene Ching Chiek Koh, Arjun Scott Nanda, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Soraya Boushaki, Andrea Degasperi, Cherif Badja, Andrew Marcel Pregnall, Salome Jingchen Zhao, Lucia Chmelova, Daniella Black and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinct repair processes produce APOBEC-induced deletions, tandem substitutions, and complex mutations in yeast and human cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Low microsatellite instability revisited: a review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Gene Ching Chiek Koh *Department of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-4954
Arjun Scott Nanda *Department of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5014-3104
Giuseppe RinaldiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-6049
Soraya BoushakiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andrea DegasperiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-0596
Cherif BadjaDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-672X
Andrew Marcel PregnallDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-0636
Salome Jingchen ZhaoDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lucia ChmelovaDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Daniella BlackDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Laura HeskinDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-6266
João DiasDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-3537
Jamie YoungDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yasin MemariDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Scott ShooterDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jan CzarneckiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-6804
Matthew Arthur BrownGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-8211
Helen Ruth DaviesDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6381-3664
Xueqing ZouDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Serena Nik-ZainalDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. sn206@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-1727

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C60100/A23433Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C60100/A25274Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C60100/A27815Cancer Research UK (CRUK) CGCATF-2021/100013DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BRC-1215-20014DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR301627Dr. Josef Steiner Krebsstiftung (Dr. Josef Steiner Cancer Research Foundation) Award 2019Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their deleterious effects, small insertions and deletions (InDels) have received far less attention than substitutions. Here we generated isogenic CRISPR-edited human cellular models of postreplicative repair dysfunction (PRRd), including individual and combined gene edits of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and replicative polymerases (Pol ε and Pol δ). Unique, diverse InDel mutational footprints were revealed. However, the prevailing InDel classification framework was unable to discriminate these InDel signatures from background mutagenesis and from each other. To address this, we developed an alternative InDel classification system that considers flanking sequences and informative motifs (for example, longer homopolymers), enabling unambiguous InDel classification into 89 subtypes. Through focused characterization of seven tumor types from the 100,000 Genomes Project, we uncovered 37 InDel signatures; 27 were new. In addition to unveiling previously hidden biological insights, we also developed PRRDetect-a highly specific classifier of PRRd status in tumors, with potential implications for immunotherapies.

Indexed as

INDEL MutationNeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIGene EditingHumansDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase III

Identifiers

PMID40210680
PMCPMC12081297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.