ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Leg Spin or Off Spin? Orthodox or Unorthodox?-An In-Depth Examination of Bowling-Batting Match-Ups and the Effectiveness of Spin Variations in International and Franchise T20 Cricket.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, 23,084 balls bowled by elite level spin bowlers across six competitions were analysed in order to fulfil two main aims; (1) investigate whether the type of spin bowler presents any tactical advantages and (2) investigate the most effective type of spin bowling variation. The results of logistic regression analyses revealed significant relationships between specific bowler-batter match-ups and runs conceded (p < 0.001). Specifically, opposing match-ups where the ball naturally spins away from right-handed and left-handed batters were revealed to be a particularly effective strategy at restricting runs conceded. Right-handed leg-spin bowlers are revealed to be significantly more likely to take the wickets of right-handed batters. Results also revealed that the 'googly' and 'carrom ball' variations are particularly effective at both, restricting runs scored and taking wickets when they are bowled to right-handed batters (both p < 0.001). Evidence suggests that certain bowler-batter match-ups present some tactical advantages and should therefore be taken into consideration in T20 cricket. Furthermore, the results also highlight the value of a wrist spinner capable of bowling 'googly' or 'carrom ball' variations. The findings of this study could potentially influence team selection, strategies, recruitment policy and general coaching practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.