ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2025
Acoustic and Psychoacoustic Analyses of Predominant Strain Elicited via Modulated Vocal Effort.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acoustic Metrics of the Strain Dimension of Voice Quality: A Scoping Review.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to examine objective correlates of strain by reducing the covarying effects of other voice qualities. Predominant strain was elicited in a group of typical voice individuals instructed to modulate their vocal effort. The resulting sustained vowel productions were evaluated by (a) auditory-perceptual ratings to confirm the presence of predominant strain, and (b) a series of objective acoustic and psychoacoustic measures previously reported as potentially effective in the characterization of strain.
methodsSustained vowel /ɑ/ productions were elicited from 37 normophonic subjects using habitual (typical) voice and intermediate and maximal levels of strained voice. Strained voice samples were elicited using specific verbal instructions, visual cues, and example voice recordings demonstrating varying levels of strain. Vowel samples were analyzed using measures of sharpness (acum), pitch strength, pitch height, cepstral measures (including cepstral peak prominence [CPP], CPP standard deviation, and CPP f RESULTS AND
conclusionsAuditory-perceptual analyses showed that productions of intermediate and maximal predominant strain were relatively unencumbered by the covarying effects of breathiness and roughness. The results showed that perceived strain is related to increased sharpness and spectral tilt, increased f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.