Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2025
Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in children aged ≥6 years with cystic fibrosis heterozygous for
Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis and F508del-gating and F508del-residual function genotypes: results from an open-label extension study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Trial
- Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Romanian Patients with Cystic Fibrosis in the Era of Highly Effective CFTR Modulator Therapy: A National Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on the nasal microbial metagenome in cystic fibrosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Cystic fibrosis care today-a narrative review based on views of experts, patients and the public.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Advances in cystic fibrosis: CFTR modulator triple combinations.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
- The impact of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Reported Adverse Events in Patients with CF Receiving Treatment with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: 5 Years Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was efficacious and safe in children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF) heterozygous for
methodsIn this phase 3b extension study, dosing was based on weight and age, with children weighing <30 kg and aged <12 years receiving ELX 100 mg once daily, TEZ 50 mg once daily and IVA 75 mg every 12 h, and children ≥30 kg or ≥12 years receiving ELX 200 mg once daily, TEZ 100 mg once daily and IVA 150 mg every 12 h. The primary end-point was safety and tolerability. Secondary and other efficacy end-points included absolute changes from parent study baseline in sweat chloride concentration, lung clearance index (LCI
resultsA total of 120 children were enrolled and dosed. 118 children (98.3%) had adverse events (AEs), which for most were mild (43.3%) or moderate (48.3%) in severity. The most common AEs (≥20% of children) were COVID-19 (58.3%), cough (51.7%), nasopharyngitis (45.0%), pyrexia (40.0%), headache (37.5%), upper respiratory tract infection (30.8%), oropharyngeal pain (26.7%), rhinitis (24.2%), abdominal pain (22.5%) and vomiting (20.0%). Children who transitioned from the placebo and ELX/TEZ/IVA groups of the parent study had improvements from parent study baseline at Week 96 in mean sweat chloride concentration (-57.3 (95% CI -61.6- -52.9) and -57.5 (95% CI -62.0- -53.0) mmol·L
conclusionsELX/TEZ/IVA treatment was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the parent study and older age groups. After starting ELX/TEZ/IVA, children had robust improvements in sweat chloride concentration and lung function that were maintained through 96 weeks. These results demonstrate the safety and durable efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in this paediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.