Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210412›Full record

Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2025

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in children aged ≥6 years with cystic fibrosis heterozygous for

Marcus A Mall, Claire E Wainwright, Julian Legg, Mark Chilvers, Sylvia Gartner, Anna-Maria Dittrich, Florian Stehling, Sarah Conner, Sebastian Grant, Nina Suresh and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The impact of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marcus A MallDepartment of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-2199
Claire E WainwrightQueensland Children's Hospital, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8389-3809
Julian LeggNational Institute for Health Research, Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Mark ChilversBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sylvia GartnerHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna-Maria DittrichDepartment for Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9582-1025
Florian StehlingChildren's Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sarah ConnerVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA.
Sebastian GrantVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA.
Nina SureshVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA.
Tanya G WeinstockVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA.
Jane C DaviesNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK j.c.davies@imperial.ac.uk.
VX20-445-119 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was efficacious and safe in children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF) heterozygous for

methodsIn this phase 3b extension study, dosing was based on weight and age, with children weighing <30 kg and aged <12 years receiving ELX 100 mg once daily, TEZ 50 mg once daily and IVA 75 mg every 12 h, and children ≥30 kg or ≥12 years receiving ELX 200 mg once daily, TEZ 100 mg once daily and IVA 150 mg every 12 h. The primary end-point was safety and tolerability. Secondary and other efficacy end-points included absolute changes from parent study baseline in sweat chloride concentration, lung clearance index (LCI

resultsA total of 120 children were enrolled and dosed. 118 children (98.3%) had adverse events (AEs), which for most were mild (43.3%) or moderate (48.3%) in severity. The most common AEs (≥20% of children) were COVID-19 (58.3%), cough (51.7%), nasopharyngitis (45.0%), pyrexia (40.0%), headache (37.5%), upper respiratory tract infection (30.8%), oropharyngeal pain (26.7%), rhinitis (24.2%), abdominal pain (22.5%) and vomiting (20.0%). Children who transitioned from the placebo and ELX/TEZ/IVA groups of the parent study had improvements from parent study baseline at Week 96 in mean sweat chloride concentration (-57.3 (95% CI -61.6- -52.9) and -57.5 (95% CI -62.0- -53.0) mmol·L

conclusionsELX/TEZ/IVA treatment was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the parent study and older age groups. After starting ELX/TEZ/IVA, children had robust improvements in sweat chloride concentration and lung function that were maintained through 96 weeks. These results demonstrate the safety and durable efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in this paediatric population.

Indexed as

AminophenolsBenzodioxolesCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorIndolesPyrazolesPyridinesQuinolonesAdolescentChildChloride Channel AgonistsDrug CombinationsFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeGenotypeHeterozygoteAminophenolsBenzodioxolesCFTR protein, humanChloride Channel AgonistsCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDrug Combinationselexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor drug combinationIndolesivacaftorPyrazolesPyridinesPyrrolidinesQuinolinesQuinolones

Identifiers

PMID40210412
PMCPMC12256806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.