Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210243›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025

Reference values for arm ergometry cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in healthy volunteers.

Joanna Shakespeare, Edward Parkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joanna ShakespeareRespiratory and Sleep Sciences, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK joanna.shakespeare@uhcw.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-1700
Edward ParkesRespiratory and Sleep Sciences, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe performance of a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) requires an individual to undertake a progressive, maximal exercise test to a symptom-limited end point. CPET is commonly performed using a treadmill or cycle ergometer (CE). Arm ergometry (AE) is an alternative exercise modality to CE; however, AE produces lower peak oxygen uptake (V̇O

aimsTo develop predicted equations and reference ranges for AE exercise testing.

designIncremental ramp protocol CPET, to a symptom-limited end point, via AE was performed in a group of 116 (62 F) healthy volunteers of median age 38 (IQR 29-48) years. Breath-by-breath gas analysis was performed using the Ultima CPX (Medical Graphics, UK) metabolic cart. Quantile regression analysis was used to develop regression equations for AE V̇O

resultsReference equations including upper and/or lower limits, based on quantile regression, were generated and verified using a validation cohort.

conclusionsThese findings represent the largest and most diverse set of predicted values and reference ranges for AE CPET parameters in healthy individuals to date. Implementation of these reference equations will allow AE to be more widely adopted, enabling the performance and interpretation of CPET in a wider population.

Indexed as

ArmErgometryExercise TestAdultAnaerobic ThresholdFemaleHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionReference ValuesExerciseLung PhysiologyRespiratory Measurement

Identifiers

PMID40210243
PMCPMC11987118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.