ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2025
TMT-Based Multiplexed (Chemo)Proteomics on the Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward simple, rapid, and deep plant proteome analysis with an in-cell proteomics strategy.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Stability-Based Proteomic Methods Add Value to Activity-Based Protein Profiling Studies.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- Aryl Aldehyde-Anchored Small Molecules Recruit FBXO22 for Targeted Degradation of NSD2.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of Confounding Factors in Reactive Cysteine Profiling Reveals Enhanced Chromatin-Protein Association via CDK7 Inhibition by THZ1.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- In Depth Characterization of the Promoter Proximal Proteome of Single Copy Locus FOXP2.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- UltraPlex-TMT: Expanding Isobaric Hyperplexing via Orthogonal Protease Cleavage.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Higher-Throughput Proteome Profiling Enabled by Parallelized Pre-Accumulation and Optimized Ion Processing in the Orbitrap Astral Zoom Mass Spectrometer.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ongoing advancements in instrumentation has established mass spectrometry (MS) as an essential tool in proteomics research and drug discovery. The newly released Asymmetric Track Lossless (Astral) analyzer represents a major step forward in MS instrumentation. Here, we evaluate the Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer in the context of tandem mass tag (TMT)-based multiplexed proteomics and activity-based proteome profiling, highlighting its sensitivity boost relative to the Orbitrap Tribrid platform-50% at the peptide and 20% at the protein level. We compare TMT data-dependent acquisition and label-free data-independent acquisition on the same instrument, both of which quantify over 10,000 human proteins per sample within 1 h. TMT offers higher quantitative precision and data completeness, while data-independent acquisition is free of ratio compression and is thereby more accurate. Our results suggest that ratio compression is prevalent with the high-resolution MS2-based quantification on the Astral, while real-time search-based MS3 quantification on the Orbitrap Tribrid platform effectively restores accuracy. Additionally, we benchmark TMT-based activity-based proteome profiling by interrogating cysteine ligandability. The Astral measures over 30,000 cysteines in a single-shot experiment, a 54% increase relative to the Orbitrap Eclipse. We further leverage this remarkable sensitivity to profile the target engagement landscape of FDA-approved covalent drugs, including sotorasib and adagrasib. We herein provide a reference for the optimal use of the advanced MS platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.