ReviewAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2025
Can mouse kidney transplant models inform mechanisms of injury and acceptance in clinical kidney transplantation?
Review in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of ischemia duration on MRI-derived perfusion parameters in a mouse kidney transplant model.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Mouse orthotopic liver transplantation: Challenges, achievements, and applications.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite standard-of-care immunosuppression, acute rejection remains commonly observed in kidney transplants and leads to chronic graft injury and failure in many transplanted patients. Mechanisms underlying acute and chronic kidney graft injury are incompletely understood, undermining the development and implementation of therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes. This compels the use of preclinical kidney transplant models to identify components and mechanisms mediating acute and chronic graft injury. Mouse models have been instrumental in establishing basic principles of alloimmune responses and the rejection of heart allografts. There is increasing use of mouse models to extend these studies to kidney transplantation, but the relevance of the findings to clinical kidney transplants remains under scrutiny. Here, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of mouse models of kidney allograft responses and injury. Although obvious weaknesses arise when considering the relevance to clinical kidney transplants, there are new models that recapitulate many features of kidney graft injury in the clinical scenario and have much to contribute to understanding innate and donor alloantigen-specific mechanisms underlying kidney allograft injury. As in most preclinical studies, the pertinent use of kidney allogeneic transplants in mice comes down to the judicious choice of test questions and the choice of appropriate donors and recipients for the chosen model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.