Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40209906›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2025

Can mouse kidney transplant models inform mechanisms of injury and acceptance in clinical kidney transplantation?

Zheng Jenny Zhang, Federica Casiraghi, Griffith Boord Perkins, William M Baldwin, Robert L Fairchild

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mouse orthotopic liver transplantation: Challenges, achievements, and applications.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zheng Jenny ZhangComprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Federica CasiraghiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Bergamo, Italy.
Griffith Boord PerkinsAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
William M BaldwinDepartment of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Robert L FairchildDepartment of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: fairchr@ccf.org.

Funding

Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney AllograftsR01AI167939 · NIAID · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Robert L Fairchild · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Acute Antibody Mediated Kidney Allograft RejectionR01AI158421 · NIAID · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI FAIRCHILD, ROBERT L · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158421NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI167939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite standard-of-care immunosuppression, acute rejection remains commonly observed in kidney transplants and leads to chronic graft injury and failure in many transplanted patients. Mechanisms underlying acute and chronic kidney graft injury are incompletely understood, undermining the development and implementation of therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes. This compels the use of preclinical kidney transplant models to identify components and mechanisms mediating acute and chronic graft injury. Mouse models have been instrumental in establishing basic principles of alloimmune responses and the rejection of heart allografts. There is increasing use of mouse models to extend these studies to kidney transplantation, but the relevance of the findings to clinical kidney transplants remains under scrutiny. Here, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of mouse models of kidney allograft responses and injury. Although obvious weaknesses arise when considering the relevance to clinical kidney transplants, there are new models that recapitulate many features of kidney graft injury in the clinical scenario and have much to contribute to understanding innate and donor alloantigen-specific mechanisms underlying kidney allograft injury. As in most preclinical studies, the pertinent use of kidney allogeneic transplants in mice comes down to the judicious choice of test questions and the choice of appropriate donors and recipients for the chosen model.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalKidney TransplantationAnimalsHumansMicekidney transplantationmouse modelsrejectionsurgical approachestolerance

Identifiers

PMID40209906
PMCPMC12221770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.