ArticleEnzyme and microbial technology2025
Microbial community analysis of the biofilms of both working and counter electrodes in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells.
Article in Enzyme and microbial technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancement of the start-up and performance of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor using electrochemically-enriched biofilm.Enzyme and microbial technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was conducted to delineate microbial community development and composition on both working and counter electrodes in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) using synthetic wastewater. Two separate bioelectrochemical reactors were inoculated with anaerobic sludge. The first was operated at an anodic potential poised at + 0.4 V and the second one at a cathodic potential poised at -0.7 V, both vs. an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. The performance of the MECs, including current generation, bioelectrochemical activity of the biofilms on both the working and counter electrodes, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) depletion were monitored over the last 45 days of operation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed to delineate the development and morphology of the microbial communities on both the working and the counter electrodes. The current generated at the anodic working electrode provided evidence of the growth of anode-respiring exoelectrogens (Clostridium sensu stricto). Similarly, the Faradaic current data at the cathodic working electrode confirmed the formation of an electroactive biofilm dominated by acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanothrix and Methanobacterium). Microbial communities on the counter electrodes were found to be richer but less diverse compared to those on the working electrodes. These communities were likely influenced by the fluctuating potentials at the counter electrodes. SEM observations were consistent with the microbial analysis. These findings demonstrate the ability of a mixed inoculum to shift towards anode-reducing and cathode methanogenic communities using a complex substrate on a constant working electrode and varying counter electrode potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.