ArticleValue in health regional issues2025
Diagnosing Burkitt Lymphoma in Sub-Saharan Africa by Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA: A Comparative Microcosting Study.
Article in Value in health regional issues, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Africa's emerging role in precision oncology: translational insights from the harnessing functional genomics in cancer research conference, Windhoek, 23-26 September 2025.BMC proceedings · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy for the diagnosis of EBV-positive Burkitt's lymphoma in endemic areas.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Is liquid biopsy a cost-effective method to diagnose Burkitt Lymphoma in children and young adults? A health economic evaluation in Tanzania.BMC medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDetermining the cost of diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma by DNA sequencing from a blood sample, compared with current histopathology. Estimating future sequencing costs at increased scale and exploring the effect of positivity rate on per-case cost.
methodsWe conducted a microcosting of both diagnostics. Resource use information was derived from standard operating procedures and interviews with staff. Unit cost data were from salary scales, purchase records, and publicly available prices. Costs were collected during 2021 and 2022, in the currency of purchase, and converted to common year (2024) and currency (US dollar [$]), with a discount rate of 5%. For increased scale, we assumed simple scaling up of current sample preparation and higher-capacity sequencing machines running at least once a week to maintain turnaround times.
resultsWe estimated a cost of $185.01 per patient for histopathology, with the main cost drivers being staining ($87.20, largely immunohistochemistry consumables, including $34.52 for antibodies) and the biopsy procedure ($72.29). The cost of the sequencing-based diagnostic was $710.15 at current throughput, with the largest contribution from the sequencing step because of the cost of sequencing reagents ($175.48 per sample). Costs are sensitive to throughput, reagent costs, and efficiency of utilization of equipment. At the current prevalence, cost per positive case is 2-fold higher at a positivity rate of 25% compared with 75%.
conclusionsWith the current technology and throughput, sequencing is likely to increase the cost of diagnosis compared with current pathology. Costs will reduce with increased scale, which requires establishing local reagent supply and maintenance capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.