ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2025
Can preoperative urodynamic studies predict de novo stress urinary incontinence following advanced pelvic organ prolapse surgery?
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Urodynamics in Pelvic Organ Prolapse to Identify Postoperative Incontinence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence or Symptomatic Worsening Following Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to assess the predictivity of preoperative urodynamics (UDS) on de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients having advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
methodsBetween January 2016 and June 2019, 133 patients with symptomatic POP at stage 3 or higher were included in the study. The presence of postoperative SUI symptoms after a minimum of six months of followup was considered the primary outcome. The results of all patients' preoperative UDS were compared to their postoperative SUI symptoms. In addition, patients were divided into two groups based on whether SUI was detected during preoperative UDS testing (group 1) or not (group 2).
resultsAlthough preoperative measurements, such as bladder capacity and residual urine volume, were not different between groups, group 1 had lower maximal urethral closure pressures (p=0.001). Preoperative SUI symptoms had a sensitivity of 32.1% and a specificity of 91.4% for predicting de novo SUI. In patients with advanced POP, preoperative UDS had a sensitivity of 60.7% and a specificity of 87.6% for predicting de novo SUI.
conclusionsUrodynamic examination with a pessary can significantly predict the development of de novo SUI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.