Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40209093›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2025

A frameshift-generated cancer neoepitope that controls tumor burden in prophylaxis as well as therapy.

Mariam M George, Cory A Brennick, Adam T Hagymasi, Tatiana V Shcheglova, Sahar Al Seesi, Tatiana J Rosales, Brian M Baker, Ion I Mandoiu, Pramod K Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariam M GeorgeDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
Cory A BrennickDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
Adam T HagymasiCarole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2805-8349
Tatiana V ShcheglovaCarole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
Sahar Al SeesiComputer Science Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Tatiana J RosalesHarper Cancer Research Institute and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Brian M BakerHarper Cancer Research Institute and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Ion I MandoiuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Pramod K SrivastavaDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.

Funding

Structural biophysics and molecular design in cellular immunityR35GM118166 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BAKER, BRIAN M · 2016 to 2025
$4.4M
Eversource Energy Chair in Experimental Oncology R35GM118166Neag Cancer Immunology Translational ProgramNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118166NIHUniversity of Notre Dame
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion or deletion of one or two base pairs within a coding region causes a frameshift, which has the potential to generate neoepitopes (InDel-generated neoepitopes) that lack a self-counterpart and are entirely novel. Despite the obvious appeal of InDel-generated neoepitopes, and the demonstration of such candidate neoepitopes that can elicit a CD8 T-cell response, no InDel-generated neoepitopes that actually control tumors in vivo have been reported thus far. Here, in a mouse colon carcinoma line, we identify 11 InDels, only one of which generates a neoepitope that elicits tumor control in vivo in models of prophylaxis as well as therapy. Although this neoepitope has no self-counterpart, it has a low affinity (IC50 33,937.60 nM) for its MHC I allele. Despite its low affinity for MHC I, this neoepitope elicits antitumor activity in vivo through CD8 T cells. Furthermore, CD8 T cells elicited by this InDel-generated neoepitope, like the neoepitopes created by point mutations, show notably less exhaustion than classical immunogenic epitopes. Ironically, this InDel-generated neoepitope follows the same rules as noted for most of the tumor control-mediating neoepitopes generated by point mutations that have a poor affinity for MHC I alleles.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesColonic NeoplasmsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFrameshift MutationAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTumor BurdenAntigens, NeoplasmEpitopes, T-Lymphocytecancer antigencancer vaccineInDelneoantigentumor-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID40209093
PMCPMC12207075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.