Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40209067›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025

Characteristics of the Newly Eligible Population under Two Recent Updates of Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations.

Yu Liu, Michael T Halpern, Robert J Volk, Ya-Chen Tina Shih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu LiuDepartment of Public Health, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5246-0290
Michael T HalpernDepartment of Health Policy and Health Services Administration, University of Texas School of Public Health San Antonio, San Antonia, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8514-6313
Robert J VolkDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-5854
Ya-Chen Tina ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-3864

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (DCP, NCI) P30CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672Sam Houston State University College of Health Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States Preventive Services Task Force updated its lung cancer screening (LCS) recommendations in 2021, and the American Cancer Society (ACS) updated its LCS guidelines in 2023. Each update expanded screening eligibility criteria, thus increasing the total number of individuals eligible for LCS. However, it is not clear whether different population subgroups benefit equally from the recent updates of LCS recommendations in terms of becoming newly eligible. We identified 85,395 individuals who were between 50 and 80 years old, smoked cigarettes formerly or currently, and did not have a history of lung cancer from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey of 2022. We used descriptive analysis to illustrate the weighted proportions of the newly screening-eligible population among different subgroups. We also applied multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the ORs of being newly eligible for LCS under each LCS recommendation update in 2021 and 2023. For both LCS updates, individuals who were non-Hispanic White males and had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly more likely to become newly eligible for LCS. A significantly larger proportion of older-age individuals became newly eligible under the 2023 ACS guideline. Noticeably, both guideline updates substantially increased the population eligible for screening among males and older individuals, two groups experiencing the majority of lung cancer incidence and mortality. Results also indicate that the screening eligibility criteria updates did not increase the OR of being eligible among racial/ethnic minority and female subgroups. Prevention Relevance: This study examines the evolving LCS guidelines and their public health impact. Analyzing the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force and 2023 ACS updates, we show expanded eligibility but persistent disparities among sociodemographic groups. Our findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve screening uptake and promote equitable, inclusive prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40209067
PMCPMC12129670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.