ReviewBlood2025
How I treat Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome.
Review in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurological manifestations in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Evolving Patterns of TPO-RA Use in Children: A Decade of Single-Centre Experience and Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Intertwining Between Arthritis and Inborn Errors of Immunity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical spectrum of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome carriers: Self-reported survey of 193 carriers.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive clinical and immunologic characterization of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome in Iran: a 10-year cohort study.BMC immunology · 2025Article
- Comorbidities in Mild WAS/XLT Require Lifelong Follow-Up and Consideration of Definitive Treatment.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractWiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare X-linked disorder, characterized by thrombocytopenia, eczema, recurrent infections, autoimmunity, and malignancy. Here, we discuss current conservative and definitive approaches to treating WAS, based on recently published evidence. Disease severity in WAS is highly variable. Recent studies confirm that the probability of disease progression depends on the type of genetic variant, supporting early diagnosis and tailored treatment strategies. Milder cases, historically termed X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT), received supportive care, whereas severe cases were referred for standard allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or gene therapy (GT) in clinical trials. Advances in HCT and GT, together with recent knowledge that even patients with XLT are at risk for severe immune complications, suggest that most young patients with WAS should be offered a potentially curative approach at diagnosis. Older patients with a small subset of milder variants may be treated conservatively unless they develop life-threatening autoimmune or malignant complications; regular monitoring and proactive management are critical to preventing irreversible complications. We recommend discontinuing the term XLT as it implies a mild and uncomplicated disease, which is not the norm, and instead tailor treatment for all patients with WAS to their individual genetic profile, disease severity, and clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.