Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40209057›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025

How Repetition Rate Impacts Detection Limits of Ion Mobility Spectrometers with Field-Switching Ion Shutters.

Martin Lippmann, Moritz Hitzemann, Alexander Nitschke, Stefan Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin LippmannDepartment of Sensors and Measurement Technology, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Measurement Technology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Appelstr. 9A, Hannover 30167, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3673-3030
Moritz HitzemannDepartment of Sensors and Measurement Technology, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Measurement Technology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Appelstr. 9A, Hannover 30167, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-8788
Alexander NitschkeDepartment of Sensors and Measurement Technology, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Measurement Technology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Appelstr. 9A, Hannover 30167, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-9620
Stefan ZimmermannDepartment of Sensors and Measurement Technology, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Measurement Technology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Appelstr. 9A, Hannover 30167, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-6657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ion mobility spectrometers are extremely sensitive analytical instruments, consisting of an ionization region and a drift region, usually separated by an ion shutter. Highest sensitivity is reached with field-switching ion shutters, as ions are accumulated in the ionization region while the ion shutter is closed, which defines the reaction time in the ionization region. This study investigates the effect of repetition rate and reaction time on ion formation and detection limits. The results reveal that increasing the ionization source intensity and reaction time increases the signal-to-noise ratio even though less spectra can be averaged in a given overall measuring time. It is shown that the formation of protonated monomers and proton-bound dimers is considerably slower than the formation of reactant ions, highlighting the impact of reaction time on signal-to-noise ratio. At maximum ionization source intensity and optimal reaction times for the protonated monomers and proton-bound dimers of 1-butanol, limits of detection of 1.9 ppt

Identifiers

PMID40209057
PMCPMC12019778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.