Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40209037›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Factors Determining Acceptance of Internet of Things in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Study.

Khadija Alhumaid, Kevin Ayoubi, Maha Khalifa, Said Salloum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khadija Alhumaid *Research & Innovation Division, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-1242-9133
Kevin Ayoubi *English Faculty, Higher Colleges of Technology - CERT, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0009-0008-5016-1060
Maha Khalifa *Research & Innovation Division, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-0130
Said Salloum *School of Computing, Skyline University College, University City, Sharjah, 1797, United Arab Emirates, 971 65441155 ext 7079.ORCID 0000-0002-6073-3981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global increase in the Internet of Things (IoT) adoption has sparked interest in its application within the educational sector, particularly in colleges and universities. Previous studies have often focused on individual attitudes toward IoT without considering a multiperspective approach and have overlooked the impact of IoT on the technology acceptance model outside the educational domain. Objective: This study aims to bridge the research gap by investigating the factors influencing IoT adoption in educational settings, thereby enhancing the understanding of collaborative learning through technology. It seeks to elucidate how IoT can facilitate learning processes and technology acceptance among college and university students in the United Arab Emirates. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to students across various colleges and universities in the United Arab Emirates, garnering 463 participants. The data collected were analyzed using a hybrid approach that integrates structural equation modeling (SEM) and artificial neural network (ANN), along with importance-performance map analysis to evaluate the significance and performance of each factor affecting IoT adoption. Results: The study, involving 463 participants, identifies 2 primary levels at which factors influence the intention to adopt IoT technologies. Initial influences include technology optimism (TOP), innovation, and learning motivation, crucial for application engagement. Advanced influences stem from technology acceptance model constructs, particularly perceived ease of use (PE) and perceived usefulness (PU), which directly enhance adoption intentions. Detailed statistical analysis using partial least squares-SEM reveals significant relationships: TOP and innovativeness impact PE (β=.412, P=.04; β=.608, P=.002, respectively), and PU significantly influences TOP (β=.381, P=.04), innovativeness (β=.557, P=.003), and learning motivation (β=.752, P<.001). These results support our hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, H4, and H5). Further, the intention to use IoT is significantly affected by PE and usefulness (β=.619, P<.001; β=.598, P<.001, respectively). ANN modeling enhances these findings, showing superior predictive power (R2=89.7%) compared to partial least squares-SEM (R2=86.3%), indicating a more effective identification of nonlinear associations. Importance-performance map analysis corroborates these results, demonstrating the importance and performance of PU as most critical, followed by technology innovativeness and optimism, in shaping behavioral intentions to use IoT. Conclusions: This research contributes methodologically by leveraging deep ANN architecture to explore nonlinear relationships among factors influencing IoT adoption in education. The study underscores the importance of both intrinsic motivational factors and perceived technological attributes in fostering IoT adoption, offering insights for educational institutions considering IoT integration into their learning environments.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersEducation, MedicalInternet of ThingsStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Arab EmiratesUniversitiesYoung AdultacceptanceadoptionANNartificial neural networkattitudecollaborative learningcollegedeep learningeducationexperienceintentInternet of ThingsIoTmedical educationneural networkopinionperceptionperspectivequestionnairestructural equation modelingstudentsurveyTAMtechnology acceptance modeltechnology innovationtechnology optimismuniversityuse

Identifiers

PMID40209037
PMCPMC12005465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.