Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208936›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A computational analysis of lexical elaboration across languages.

Temuulen Khishigsuren, Terry Regier, Ekaterina Vylomova, Charles Kemp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A computational analysis of lexical elaboration across languages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Temuulen KhishigsurenSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5251-5733
Terry RegierDepartment of Linguistics, Cognitive Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-5208
Ekaterina VylomovaSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-5459
Charles KempSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-8737

Funding

Australian Research Council FT190100200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Claims about lexical elaboration (e.g. Mongolian has many horse-related terms) are widespread in the scholarly and popular literature. Here, we show that computational analyses of bilingual dictionaries can be used to test claims about lexical elaboration at scale. We validate our approach by introducing BILA, a dataset including 1,574 bilingual dictionaries, and showing that it confirms 147 out of 163 previous claims from the literature. We then identify previously unreported examples of lexical elaboration, and analyze how lexical elaboration is influenced by ecological and cultural variables. Claims about lexical elaboration are sometimes dismissed as either obvious or fanciful, but our work suggests that large-scale computational approaches to the topic can produce nonobvious and well-grounded insights into language and culture.

Indexed as

LanguageLinguisticsMultilingualismHumansdictionarieslexical elaborationlexiconlinguistic variation

Identifiers

PMID40208936
PMCPMC12012552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.