SynthesisPloS one2025
Comparative Impact of Integrated Palliative Care vs. Standard Care on the Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family-centered care for cancer patients and their families in developing countries: an integrative review.BMC health services research · 2026Review
- Integrated palliative nursing interventions for older adults with cancer: Effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and symptom burden.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study Applying EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS Score at 1-6 Months Postoperatively.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of the Ketogenic Diet in Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2026Review
- From reporting to relating: Reimagining ePROMs in cancer symptom management.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- Article
- Registered nurses' perceptions of food and mealtimes in palliative care: a cross-sectional study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-08-04Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Methods · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Investigation by Third Party ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionCancer is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, significantly impairing patients' quality of life (QoL). Integrated Palliative Care (IPC) has been proposed as a holistic approach to enhance quality of life by addressing patients' physical, emotional, and psychosocial needs. While some studies suggest Integrated Palliative Care improves quality of life more than standard care, the evidence remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the comparative impact of Integrated Palliative Care versus standard care on the quality of life in cancer patients. MethodsA comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Integrated Palliative Care and standard care for cancer patients, focusing on the quality of life as measured by validated tools such as the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to account for study heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. ResultsNine randomized controlled trials involving 1,794 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that Integrated Palliative Care significantly improved quality of life compared to standard care (SMD = 3.25; 95% CI: 1.20-5.30; p < 0.001). Studies conducted in Asia showed the highest standardized mean difference (SMD = 6.15; 95% CI: 3.07-9.23; p < 0.001), followed closely by studies from Africa (SMD = 6.0; 95% CI: 5.13-6.87; p < 0.001), compared to those from other regions. Similarly, research focusing on lung cancer patients showed the greatest standardized mean difference of (SMD = 6.15; 95% CI: 3.07-9.23; p < 0.001) relative to other cancer types. Furthermore, studies involving newly diagnosed cancer patients recorded the highest standardized mean difference of (SMD = 5.69; 95% CI: 4.57-6.80; p < 0.001). ConclusionIntegrated Palliative Care significantly enhances the quality of life in cancer patients compared to standard care. These findings support integrating Integrated Palliative Care into oncology practices to provide comprehensive, patient-centered care that addresses both physical and emotional needs. Further research should explore long-term benefits across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.