ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Flow mechanisms of the air-blood barrier.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human lungs fluid mechanics: an overview of current modelling techniques.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026Review
- The alveolar edema equation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The air-blood barrier protects the lung from blood/serum entering the air spaces, i.e., from "drowning in your own fluids". Failure leads to pulmonary edema, a regularly fatal complication during the Covid-19 pandemic which claimed 7 million lives worldwide. Finding no mathematical models for the underlying fluid mechanics, we created the first. Governing flow equations for alveolar capillary, interstitium, and alveolus are coupled by crossflows at the capillary and epithelial membranes and end-exit flows to the lymphatics. Case examples include normal/recovery, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome, effects of positive end expiratory pressure, and a wide range of parameter values for permeability of the membranes and interstitial matrix. Previously unknown membrane fluid shear stresses calculate to values that affect cell function in many systems. We add active epithelial reabsorption which has two effects: shifting streamlines to favor alveolar-lymphatic clearance and adding to the direct alveolar-capillary clearance. Simple algebraic equations are derived for the interstitial fluid pressure, pi, membrane crossflow velocities and the critical capillary pressure, pcrit, above which edema occurs. For validation, the pcrit predictions fit clinical definitions and flow calculations of lymphatic vs capillary clearance match animal experimental data. For decades the value of pi has been imposed as an input, whereas we calculate the value as an output. They don't agree. Since the space is too small for measurements, the ability to calculate pi and pcrit offers new insights, questions long-held beliefs, and opens applications from physiological studies to personalized clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.