ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluating the three-level approach of the U-smile method for imbalanced binary classification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-life binary classification problems often involve imbalanced datasets, where the majority class outnumbers the minority class. We previously developed the U-smile method, which comprises the U-smile plot and the BA, RB and I coefficients, to assess the usefulness of a new variable added to a reference prediction model and validated it under class balance. In this study, we evaluated the U-smile method under class imbalance, proposed a three-level approach of the U-smile method, and used the I coefficients as a weighting factor for point size in the U-smile plots of the BA and RB coefficients. Using real data from the Heart Disease dataset and generated random variables, we built logistic regression models to assess four new variables added to the reference model (nested setting). These models were evaluated at seven pre-defined imbalance levels of 1%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 99% of the event class. The results of the U-smile method were compared to those of certain traditional measures: Brier skill score, net reclassification index, difference in F1-score, difference in Matthews correlation coefficient, difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the new and reference models, and the likelihood-ratio test. The reference model overfitted to the majority class at higher imbalance levels. The BA-RB-I coefficients of the U-smile method identified informative variables across the entire imbalance range. At higher imbalance levels, the U-smile method indicated both prediction improvement in the minority class (positive BA and I coefficients) and reduction in overfitting to the majority class (negative RB coefficients). The U-smile method outperformed traditional evaluation measures across most of the imbalance range. It proved highly effective in variable selection for imbalanced binary classification, making it a useful tool for real-life problems, where imbalanced datasets are prevalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.