ArticlePloS one2025
Detecting newly installed bat boxes: Bats' prior familiarity with artificial roosts may play a bigger role than improved echo-reflective properties.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Habitat loss in Europe severely affects bats, particularly tree-roosting species, due to the decreasing availability of tree cavities. One common conservation strategy is the installation of artificial roost boxes. However, the occupation of newly installed roost boxes can take up to several years, and the underlying mechanisms for successful roost detection in bats are still poorly understood. This study proposes enhancing the detectability of roost boxes to echolocating bats by incorporating hollow hemispheres that provide highly conspicuous echoes. The hemispheres strongly reflect the echolocation calls of passing bats and are thus well detectable over a broad range of angles. We hypothesized that roost boxes equipped with these hemispheres would attract more bats and exhibit greater bat activity than standard, unmodified boxes. To evaluate this, we placed 30 modified boxes and 30 unmodified boxes across three forest areas in Northern Germany, each differing in proximity to known bat hibernation sites and the prior presence of artificial roosts. We monitored bat activity by measuring light beam interruptions at each box and found that the activity of bats at the boxes varied considerably. Our findings indicate that, contrary to our hypothesis, bat activity was more strongly influenced by their prior experience with artificial roosts than by the increased detectability provided by hollow hemispheres. Furthermore, our study revealed that light beam interruptions indicated bat presence at the boxes earlier than visual checks for bats or feces, showcasing the benefits of non-invasive monitoring techniques. Conservation efforts are complex, and these results imply that for effective bat conservation, increasing bats' familiarity with artificial roosts may be more important than merely enhancing the detectability of these structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.