ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing the cardioprotective effects of exercise in APOE mouse models using deep learning and photon-counting micro-CT.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treadmill exercise ameliorates atherogenesis and vascular inflammation in ApoEScientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe allelic variations of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene play a critical role in regulating lipid metabolism and significantly impact cardiovascular disease risk (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of exercise on cardiac structure and function in mouse models expressing different APOE genotypes using photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) and deep learning-based segmentation.
methodsA total of 140 mice were grouped based on APOE genotype (APOE2, APOE3, APOE4), sex, and exercise regimen. All mice were maintained on a controlled diet to isolate the effects of exercise. Low dose cardiac photon counting micro-CT imaging with intrinsic gating was performed using a custom-built micro-PCCT system and data was reconstructed with an iterative algorithm incorporating both temporal and spectral dimensions. A liposomal-iodine nanoparticle contrast agent was intravenously administered to uniformly opacify cardiovascular structures. Cardiac structures were segmented using a 3D U-Net deep learning model that was trained and validated on manually labeled data. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA, post-hoc analysis, and stratified group comparisons, were used to assess the effects of genotype, sex, and exercise on key cardiac metrics, including ejection fraction and cardiac index.
resultsThe PCCT imaging pipeline provided high-resolution images with enhanced contrast between blood compartment and myocardium allowing for precise segmentation of cardiac features. Deep learning-based segmentation achieved high accuracy with an average Dice coefficient of 0.85. Exercise significantly improved cardiac performance, with ejection fraction increasing by up to 18% and cardiac index by 46% in exercised males, who generally benefited more from exercise. Females, particularly those with the APOE4 genotype, also showed improvements, with a 31% higher ejection fraction in exercised versus non-exercised mice. Stratified analyses confirmed that both sexes benefited from exercise, with males showing larger effect sizes. APOE3 and APOE4 genotypes derived the greatest benefit, while APOE2 mice showed no significant improvement.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the utility of PCCT combined with deep learning segmentation in assessing the cardioprotective effects of exercise in APOE mouse models. These findings highlight the importance of genotype-specific approaches in understanding and potentially mitigating the impact of CVD through lifestyle interventions such as exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.