Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208820›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Paper-based death record-keeping in Bangladeshi cemeteries: a qualitative exploration of practices and expectations.

Hossain Md Alamgir, Rahman Md Hafizur, Akter Ema, Islam Sm Hasibul, Akter Tahmina, Islam Md Shahidul, Ara Tasnu, Maher Manna Ridwana, Tippett Barr Beth A, El Arifeen Shams and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hossain Md AlamgirMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Rahman Md HafizurMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Akter EmaMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Islam Sm HasibulMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Akter TahminaMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Islam Md ShahidulMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Ara TasnuMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Maher Manna RidwanaMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Tippett Barr Beth ANyanja Health Research Institute, Salima, Malawi.
El Arifeen ShamsMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Rahman Ahmed EhsanurMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Hossain Aniqa TasnimMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh.
Perkins Janet ESchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Countries like Bangladesh face significant challenges in effectively registering and tracking deaths within their civil registration systems, which are essential for public health. To improve data collection for public health policy, death record-keeping at burial sites should be enhanced, particularly in areas where burial certificates are issued. With this in mind, we examined the traditional paper-based practices for recording deaths, the perceived significance of these practices, and the associated challenges, expectations, and concerns related to death record-keeping in Bangladeshi cemeteries. Methods: In 2021, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study involving 25 in-depth interviews with individuals who had lost relatives during the COVID-19 pandemic and key informant interviews with service providers at cemeteries. We complemented these interviews with non-participant observations of burial registration practices in seven cemeteries across urban, peri-urban, and rural settings. We used thematic analysis to interpret the data. Results: Our findings reveal diverse death record-keeping practices influenced by sociocultural and administrative dynamics, emphasising the necessity of accurate documentation for securing legal rights and social benefits, such as inheritance and welfare. Notable tensions exist between bureaucratic demands and the emotional realities of grieving families, particularly in non-standardised cemeteries, where acquiring death certificates poses challenges. Stakeholders view the anticipated digitalisation of death record-keeping as a transformative opportunity to streamline processes and improve access to information. However, this transition also highlights existing generational and educational disparities in technological skills, alongside ethical concerns regarding data security and user confidentiality. Conclusions: Our findings showcase the complex interaction between cultural practices, bureaucratic frameworks, and emerging digital technologies in managing death records in Bangladesh. They also emphasise the challenges of modernising traditional documentation methods, as well as the importance of maintaining death records for enhancing civil registration and vital statistics, asserting property rights, and monitoring mortality. A digital system could provide innovative and reliable mortality surveillance from cemeteries.

Indexed as

BurialCOVID-19Death CertificatesAdultBangladeshFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40208820
PMCPMC11984622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.