Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2025
Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients Hospitalized With Skin and Soft Tissue Infection: The INSPIRE 3 Skin and Soft Tissue Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05423756 (The INSPIRE-ASP Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The INSPIRE-ASP Trial (INtelligent Stewardship Prompts to Improve Real-Time Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients) for Skin and Soft Tissue (SST) Infections
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients With Cancer Hospitalized With Infection: Secondary Analysis of the INSPIRE Cluster Randomized Trials.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- What's Hot This Year in ID Clinical Science 2025.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Review
- Collection of implementation-related data in pragmatic clinical trials: a cross-sectional study from the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Guidance for the Knowledge and Skills required for Antimicrobial Stewardship Leaders: an update from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- R.I.S.E. ID: Adaptations to the Current Political Climate for the Infectious Diseases Frontline.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Indication-based electronic prescribing intervention reduces unnecessary meropenem use in a safety-net hospital: a quasi-experimental study.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Empiric extended-spectrum antibiotics are routinely prescribed for patients hospitalized with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) despite low likelihoods of infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Objective: To evaluate whether computerized provider order entry (CPOE) prompts presenting patient-specific and pathogen-specific MDRO infection risk estimates could reduce empiric extended-spectrum antibiotics for noncritically ill patients admitted with SSTI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial included 92 hospitals and assessed the effect of an antibiotic stewardship bundle that included CPOE prompts vs routine stewardship on antibiotic selection during the first 3 hospital days (empiric period) in noncritically ill adults hospitalized with SSTI. The trial population included adults 18 years and older treated with empiric antibiotics for SSTI in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Data were collected from January 2019 to December 2023. Interventions: CPOE prompts recommending standard-spectrum antibiotics in patients prescribed extended-spectrum antibiotics during the empiric period when absolute risk of MDRO SSTI was estimated to be less than 10%, coupled with feedback and education. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was empiric extended-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy (summed number of different extended-spectrum antibiotics targeting Pseudomonas and/or MDR gram-negative bacteria received per patient each calendar day). The secondary outcome was antipseudomonal days of therapy. Safety outcomes included days to ICU transfer and hospital length of stay. Outcomes compared differences between baseline and intervention periods across strategies. Results: Among 118 562 patients admitted with SSTI at 92 hospitals, 67 033 (56.7%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (17.5) years. A total of 57 837 patients were included in the baseline period and 60 725 in the intervention period. Receipt of any empiric extended-spectrum antibiotic during the baseline and intervention periods was 57.0% (16 855 of 29 595) and 56.0% (17 534 of 31 337), respectively, for the routine stewardship group compared with 55.4% (15 650 of 28 242) and 43.0% (12 647 of 29 388), respectively, for the CPOE group. Empiric extended-spectrum days of therapy per 1000 empiric days targeting Pseudomonas and/or MDR gram-negative pathogens was 511.5 during the baseline period and 488.7 during the intervention period in the routine stewardship group and was 496.2 and 359.1, respectively, in the CPOE bundle group (rate ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79; P < .001). There was no evidence of inferiority in the CPOE bundle group for mean (SD) hospital length of stay (routine stewardship, 6.5 [3.8] days; CPOE bundle, 6.4 [3.8] days) and days to ICU transfer (routine stewardship, 6.3 [3.2] days; CPOE bundle, 6.3 [3.1] days). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, CPOE prompts recommending standard-spectrum empiric antibiotics for low-risk patients hospitalized with SSTI coupled with education and feedback significantly reduced use of extended-spectrum antibiotics without increasing admissions to ICUs or hospital length of stay. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05423756.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.