Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208563›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Mass spectrometry-based identification reveals the polymicrobial nature of canine urinary tract infections.

Natália Rodrigues Paschoal, Fábio Vinícius Ramos Portilho, Beatriz Oliveira de Almeida, Marcelo Fagali Arabe Filho, Carolina Aparecida Rodrigues, Thaís Spessotto Bello, Patrik Júnior de Lima Paz, Fernando José Paganini Listoni, Márcio Garcia Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natália Rodrigues PaschoalDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-3054
Fábio Vinícius Ramos PortilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Beatriz Oliveira de AlmeidaDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Marcelo Fagali Arabe FilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Carolina Aparecida RodriguesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Thaís Spessotto BelloDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Patrik Júnior de Lima PazDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Fernando José Paganini ListoniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Márcio Garcia RibeiroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University -UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil. marcio.ribeiro@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-9389

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 310345/2020-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in veterinary practice and often have a complex etiology. Typically, diagnoses rely on classical phenotypic tests or are limited to identifying the genus of the pathogen. Treatments are frequently administered without prior in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This study analyzed 389 urine samples from dogs with clinical signs of UTI, collected by cystocentesis, through microbiological culture. Species-level identification of bacteria and yeasts was performed using mass spectrometry, while bacterial isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing via the disk diffusion method. Of the 389 samples, 170 (43.7%) showed microbial growth, with 192 microorganisms identified. Among these, 98.4% (189/192) were bacteria, and 1.6% (3/192) were fungi/yeasts. The predominant pathogens included Enterobacteria (116/192 = 60%), enterococci (26/192 = 13.5%), and staphylococci (24/192 = 12.5%). Novel pathogens, such as Lactobacillus murinus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, were identified as primary agents of canine UTIs. Coinfections commonly involved E. coli with either E. faecalis (5/21 = 23.8%) or S. canis (4/21 = 19%). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most effective antimicrobial (≥ 70%), followed by amikacin and marbofloxacin (≥ 60%). Observed antimicrobial resistance rates included enterobacteria (18%), enterococci (> 40%), staphylococci (18%), streptococci (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (60%), and other organisms (> 30%). Multidrug resistance affected 18% (34/189) of bacterial isolates. This study highlights the polymicrobial nature of canine UTIs and emphasizes concerns about multidrug-resistant bacteria. These findings contribute to improving molecular diagnostics and monitoring antimicrobial resistance in domestic animals, a critical global issue.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsCoinfectionDog DiseasesFungiUrinary Tract InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDogsMass SpectrometryMicrobial Sensitivity TestsYeastsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial multidrug resistanceCanine microbial etiologyCanine urinary infectionsMALDI-TOF MS

Identifiers

PMID40208563
PMCPMC12095114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.