ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Mass spectrometry-based identification reveals the polymicrobial nature of canine urinary tract infections.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canine urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in veterinary practice and often have a complex etiology. Typically, diagnoses rely on classical phenotypic tests or are limited to identifying the genus of the pathogen. Treatments are frequently administered without prior in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This study analyzed 389 urine samples from dogs with clinical signs of UTI, collected by cystocentesis, through microbiological culture. Species-level identification of bacteria and yeasts was performed using mass spectrometry, while bacterial isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing via the disk diffusion method. Of the 389 samples, 170 (43.7%) showed microbial growth, with 192 microorganisms identified. Among these, 98.4% (189/192) were bacteria, and 1.6% (3/192) were fungi/yeasts. The predominant pathogens included Enterobacteria (116/192 = 60%), enterococci (26/192 = 13.5%), and staphylococci (24/192 = 12.5%). Novel pathogens, such as Lactobacillus murinus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, were identified as primary agents of canine UTIs. Coinfections commonly involved E. coli with either E. faecalis (5/21 = 23.8%) or S. canis (4/21 = 19%). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most effective antimicrobial (≥ 70%), followed by amikacin and marbofloxacin (≥ 60%). Observed antimicrobial resistance rates included enterobacteria (18%), enterococci (> 40%), staphylococci (18%), streptococci (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (60%), and other organisms (> 30%). Multidrug resistance affected 18% (34/189) of bacterial isolates. This study highlights the polymicrobial nature of canine UTIs and emphasizes concerns about multidrug-resistant bacteria. These findings contribute to improving molecular diagnostics and monitoring antimicrobial resistance in domestic animals, a critical global issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.