Observational studyCardiovascular toxicology2025
Predicting 30-Day Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Observational Study Utilizing XGBoost.
Observational study in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiovascular toxicity: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiotoxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor cardiotoxicity using machine learning: a systematic review of model performance and methodological quality.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity: a cellular pharmacology perspective on susceptibility and resistance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for the Detection and Management of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiotoxicity.Cancer innovation · 2025Article
- PiCCO hemodynamic parameters in cardiogenic shock: prediction of LVEF, NT-proBNP and MACE based on XGBoost machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI)-related cardiotoxicity has a high mortality rate, making early prediction crucial for improving patient prognosis. However, early prediction models are currently lacking in clinical practice. This study aims to develop an early prediction model for ICI-related cardiotoxicity using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who received ICI therapy between January 2020 and December 2023. The population was categorized into a cardiotoxicity group and a non-cardiotoxicity group based on the presence of cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiogram abnormalities that could not be attributed to other diseases within 30 days after initiation ICI therapy. The dataset was split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost models were constructed in Python, with variables selected based on each model's characteristics. The models were compared based on predictive performance, which was measured by area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). The best model was explained using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP). A total of 419 patients were included. The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest predictive performance with an AUC of 0.83, outperforming LR (AUC: 0.80) and RF (AUC: 0.74) models. DCA confirmed the XGBoost model's superior net benefit. Among the selected predictors, cardiac troponin T (cTnT) emerged as the most important variable, demonstrating the highest feature importance. The XGBoost model proposed could assist clinicians in personalized risk stratification for patients on ICI therapy, facilitating precise monitoring of cardiotoxicity and tailored treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40208554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.