Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208545›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

A Method to Evaluate Skin and Skin Substitute Mechanical Properties Using a Suction Device.

Vivienne Woodtli, David Sachs, Alberto Stracuzzi, Serjosha Robmann, Thomas Biedermann, Sophie Böttcher-Haberzeth, Bettina Thumm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivienne WoodtliPediatric Burn Center, Children's Skin Center, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David SachsCitus AG, c/o EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Alberto StracuzziCitus AG, c/o EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Serjosha RobmannCitus AG, c/o EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Thomas BiedermannChildren's Research Center (CRC), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sophie Böttcher-HaberzethPediatric Burn Center, Children's Skin Center, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bettina ThummCitus AG, c/o EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland. bettina.thumm@citus-ag.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing skin tissue engineering necessitates the precise and objective assessment of scar quality. One approach to achieve this evaluation is through the measurement of the skin's or skin substitutes specific mechanical properties, such as elasticity and firmness. This chapter introduces a measurement protocol for clinical assessment of these properties using a suction device, known as the Nimble. The Nimble device quantitatively evaluates the mechanical characteristics of the skin by applying controlled negative pressure to elevate the skin to a predetermined level, thereby allowing for the measurement of skin elasticity and other related parameters. In this chapter, we provide a detailed description of the Nimble's operation, including the step-by-step process for conducting measurements, and offer guidance on the interpretation of the collected data to assess scar quality effectively.

Indexed as

SkinSkin, ArtificialSkin Physiological PhenomenaBiomechanical PhenomenaCicatrixElasticityHumansSuctionTissue EngineeringMechanical skin responseScar qualitySkin elasticitySkin substitute mechanical propertySuction device

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.