ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Incorporating frequency domain features into radiomics for improved prognosis of esophageal cancer.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor prognosis, making accurate prognostic assessment essential for patient care. The performance of the esophageal cancer prognosis model based on conventional radiomics is limited, as it mainly characterizes the spatial features such as texture of the tumor area, and cannot fully describe the complexity of esophageal cancer tumors. Therefore, we incorporate the frequency domain features into radiomics to improve the prognostic ability of esophageal cancer. Three hundred fifteen esophageal cancer patients participated in the death risk prediction experiment, with 80% being the training set and 20% being the testing set. We use fivefold cross validation for training, and fuse the 5 trained models through voting to obtain the final prognostic model for testing. The CatBoost achieved the best performance compared to machine learning methods such as random forests and decision tree. The experimental results showed that the combination of frequency domain and radiomics features achieved the highest performance in death predicting esophageal cancer (accuracy: 0.7423, precision: 0.7470, recall: 0.7375, specification: 0.8030, AUC: 0.8487), which was significantly better than the performance of frequency domain or radiomics features alone. The results of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis validated the performance of our method in death predicting esophageal cancer. The proposed method provides technical support for accurate prognosis of esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40208480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.