ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
A comparative study on the hemodynamic effects of initiating positive airway pressure treatment in patients with obstructive and central sleep apnea.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBoth obstructive (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) are associated with considerable cardiovascular morbidity which argues for treatment initiation with a positive airway pressure (PAP) device even in the absence of significant day-time sleepiness. While the long-term consequences of PAP treatment in patients with sleep disordered breathing have been investigated in several studies, less is known about the immediate hemodynamic effects. Therefore, the present study intended to investigate the immediate effect of PAP treatment on non-invasively measured hemodynamic parameters in 10 patients with either OSAS or CSA.
methodsDuring diagnostic and therapeutic conditions, the routine polysomnographic assessment was extended with an impedance cardiography (ICG) system. Statistical analysis was performed to find differences between both groups and conditions. In addition, the relationship between the treatment associated effect on stroke volume (SV) with biometric, polysomnographic, and cardiovascular parameters was assessed.
resultsComparing both subgroups, we found statistically significant differences for biometric, polysomnographic, and cardiovascular parameters. Patients with CSA were older (p = 0.0005) and had higher values for diagnostic (p = 0.015) and therapeutic (p = 0.029) pulse pressure and the pre-ejection period under diagnostic conditions (p = 0.031). In contrast to patients with CSA who exhibited a slight increase of SV and derived parameters under therapeutic conditions, a pronounced decrease was observed in patients with OSAS which was statistically significant for the cardiac index (p = 0.038).
conclusionOur results indicate that patients with OSAS and CSA who are characterized by unique clinical features may show a distinguishable hemodynamic response to PAP treatment that can be measured non-invasively with ICG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.