ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Revolutionizing cleft lip and palate management through artificial intelligence: a scoping review.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate in Diagnosis and Detection-An Umbrella Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Classification of Cleft and Craniofacial Procedures From Operative Notes: Model Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and management of cleft lip and palate: An updated review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Advanced Strategies in the Repair of Alveolar Cleft Defects: Biological Approaches, Biomaterials, and Future Perspectives.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNot much is known about the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in cleft lip and/or palate. We aim to perform a scoping review to synthesize the literature in the last 10 years on integrating AI in the approach to this condition and highlight aspects of research into its prediction, diagnosis and treatment.
methodsA search was performed via PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and LILACS from 2014 to 2024, in which 649 articles were identified, and 3 studies were identified via the snowball method; the title and abstract were identified, and 35 articles were obtained for full reading. Finally, 25 studies were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to execute this review.
resultsThe articles reviewed included different types of studies, with observational and experimental studies being frequent and systematic reviews and narratives being less frequent. Similarly, there was evidence of a generalized distribution, with a greater concentration in the United States. These studies were analyzed according to the use of AI applied to cleft lip/palate, obtaining 6 subcategories, including diagnosis, prediction, treatment, and education, in which different types of AI models were included, most frequently using deep learning and machine learning.
conclusionThese technologies promise to optimize the care of patients with this condition. Although current advances are promising, further research is essential to expand and refine their beneficial use. AI has driven significant advances in various stages of the cleft lip and/or palate approach, integrating tools such as assisted algorithms, genetics-based predictive models, and advanced surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.