ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Assessing beam hardening artifacts in coronary stent imaging using different CT acquisition parameters on photon-counting detector computed tomography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical benefits and current challenges of photon-counting detector CT in vascular imaging.Radiology advances · 2026Review
- Investigating the necessity of preoperative coronary angiography for infection-related cardiac implantable electronic device explantation.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Photon-Counting CT Angiography in Vascular Stenosis Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Photon-Counting CT in Cardiovascular Imaging: Clinical Applications.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether different scan protocols using a first-generation dual-source photon-counting CT (PCD-CT) can reduce coronary stent artifacts and improve image quality in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and in-stent restenosis (ISR). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients undergoing CCTA for suspected ISR or progression of CAD were consecutively enrolled between November 2021 and February 2023. Patients were scanned on a dual-source PCD-CT using standard acquisition mode with collimation of 144 × 0.4 mm or ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode with collimation of 120 × 0.2 mm. Tube voltages were set at 120 or 140 kV. Scans were reconstructed using a standard kernel (Bv48), with UHR scans also reconstructed using a sharper kernel (Bv56).
resultsA total of 25 patients were included in the study, of whom 80% were male, with a mean age of 68 ± 8 years (IQR 64.8-75.3). UHR mode, particularly with Bv56 kernels, provided significantly thinner vessel walls and reduced beam hardening artifacts compared to standard mode and Bv48 kernel, especially at lower tube voltages. Noise levels varied, with generally lower noise in UHR scans.
conclusionUHR mode with Bv56 kernels improves artifact reduction and vessel visualization in coronary stents, offering advantages over standard CCTA protocols. These findings may enhance the clinical diagnosis of ISR, leading to better patient outcomes through improved treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40208433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.