Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025

Evaluating a customised large language model (DELSTAR) and its ability to address medication-related questions associated with delirium: a quantitative exploratory study.

Katharina Teresa Spagl, Edward William Watson, Adam Jatowt, Anita Elaine Weidmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prompt injection of OpenAI custom GPTs leaks informatics secrets.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharina Teresa SpaglDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Innsbruck University, Innrain 80, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7426-3684
Edward William WatsonDepartment of Media and Learning Technology, Innsbruck University, Innrain 52, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Adam JatowtDepartment of Computer Science and Digital Science Centre, Innsbruck University, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7235-0665
Anita Elaine WeidmannDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Innsbruck University, Innrain 80, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. anita.weidmann@uibk.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3670-2357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA customised large language model (LLM) could serve as a next-generation clinical pharmacy research assistant to prevent medication-associated delirium. Comprehensive evaluation strategies are still missing.

aimThis quantitative exploratory study aimed to develop an approach to comprehensively assess the domain-specific customised delirium LLM (DELSTAR) ability, quality and performance to accurately address complex clinical and practice research questions on delirium that typically require extensive literature searches and meta-analyses.

methodDELSTAR, focused on delirium-associated medications, was implemented as a 'Custom GPT' for quality assessment and as a Python-based software pipeline for performance testing on closed and leading open models. Quality metrics included statement accuracy and data credibility; performance metrics covered F1-Score, sensitivity/specificity, precision, AUC, and AUC-ROC curves.

resultsDELSTAR demonstrated more accurate and comprehensive information compared to information retrieved by traditional systematic literature reviews (SLRs) (p < 0.05) and accessed Application Programmer Interfaces (API), private databases, and high-quality sources despite mainly relying on less reliable internet sources. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o emerged as the most reliable foundation models. In Dataset 2, GPT-4o (F1-Score: 0.687) and Llama3-70b (F1-Score: 0.655) performed best, while in Dataset 3, GPT-3.5 (F1-Score: 0.708) and GPT-4o (F1-Score: 0.665) led. None consistently met desired threshold values across all metrics.

conclusionDELSTAR demonstrated potential as a clinical pharmacy research assistant, surpassing traditional SLRs in quality. Improvements are needed in high-quality data use, citation, and performance optimisation. GPT-4o, GPT-3.5, and Llama3-70b were the most suitable foundation models, but fine-tuning DELSTAR is essential to enhance sensitivity, especially critical in pharmaceutical contexts.

Indexed as

DeliriumPharmacy Service, HospitalSoftwareHumansLarge Language ModelsClinical pharmacy information systemsDeliriumDrug prescribingIntelligence artificialIntelligence machinePatient safety

Identifiers

PMID40208398
PMCPMC12335389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.