Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208285›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

The pitfalls of fixed-ratio data splitting in radiomics model performance evaluation.

Haoru Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Haoru WangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Disorders, Chongqing, China. wanghaoru615@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-0872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, radiomics has seen exponential growth, with over ten thousand publications in PubMed and a steady increase in related studies in journals like Abdominal Radiology. Despite the potential of radiomics, a major challenge lies in validating radiomics models, as most studies rely on single-center datasets with fixed-ratio splits, which can lead to variability in performance due to randomness in data splitting. Therefore, researchers should adopt more robust cross-validation methods rather than relying solely on the fixed-ratio holdout method to ensure robust and reliable radiomics model performance evaluation.

Indexed as

Radiography, AbdominalHumansRadiomicsCross validationMachine learningMedical imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40208285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.