SynthesisHealth promotion international2025
Shared reading interventions to promote psychosocial well-being in older adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Impact of a Digital Reading Program on Apathy Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Rural Canada: Insights from Socioemotional Selectivity Theory.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Participatory interventions, such as art therapy and group activities, have been shown to promote healthy aging. However, the effectiveness of shared reading among older adults requires further evidence. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the impact and effectiveness of shared reading groups in slowing cognitive impairment, improving social interaction, promoting psychosocial well-being, and enhancing functional aspects among older adults living in the community. The selection criteria included studies published in English after 2000 focusing on individuals aged 60 and above and examining the benefits of shared reading. The studies also included participants with cognitive or psychiatric conditions who were independent. Seven databases were queried for this research. A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. A descriptive analysis of the included studies revealed the tools used to measure the impact of interventions on outcomes and the key results obtained. Despite variability in methodology and outcomes, the results showed that group activities can improve self-rated health and reduce depressive symptoms in older adults. Interventions that include reading as a form of cognitive stimulation enhance communication skills, contribute to well-being, improve quality of life, reduce loneliness, and increase social engagement. Shared reading has positive effects on satisfaction with social relationships and community support. The findings suggested that shared reading groups represent a promising, non-pharmacological intervention for promoting psychological health, well-being, and social interaction. This review gathers existing literature and highlights the need for further studies to explore the effectiveness of this approach and to improve its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.