Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208187›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?

Ashley Schram, Sharon Friel, Anne-Marie Thow, Sirinya Phulkerd, Carmen Huckel Schneider, Jeff Collin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashley SchramAustralian Research Centre for Health Equity (ARCHE), School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), Australian National University, 8 Fellows Rd, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-6291
Sharon FrielAustralian Research Centre for Health Equity (ARCHE), School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), Australian National University, 8 Fellows Rd, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Anne-Marie ThowMenzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre, John Hopkins Drive, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-5864
Sirinya PhulkerdInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Salaya Campus, 999 Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Carmen Huckel SchneiderMenzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre, John Hopkins Drive, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jeff CollinSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, United Kingdom.

Funding

Australian Research Council GA28785-V3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of financialization and the commercial determinants of health (CDoH), with a focus on Australian food systems. While existing research highlights the food industry's role in shaping dietary patterns and health outcomes, the financial sector's influence on food systems governance remains underexamined. By investigating key actors in food systems investment policy and practice and the types of power they wield, this study contributes to a growing body of literature on CDoH. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with financial (e.g. investment banks and assets managers) and non-financial (e.g. food industry, government, and civil society) actors in Australia. Applying Moon's expanded power typology, we examined how financial and non-financial actors influence food systems investment, the disruptive potential of the financial sector on established power dynamics, and implications for the healthfulness of food environments. Our results identified economic power as the foundation of influence, but network and expert power were seen as critical, especially for financial actors to get deals done. Financial actors, including the 'responsible investment' sector, were perceived as potentially disrupting traditional power dynamics dominated by transnational food companies. Financial norms and practices manifested differently among different actors and areas of food systems. Governments were viewed as largely absent, with calls for them to articulate a clear investment policy vision to guide healthier food systems. This study provides novel insights into financial sector involvement in food systems, the disruption of traditional power dynamics, and opportunities for healthier food systems while also raising risks for increased market concentration through financialization.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFood IndustryFood SupplyInvestmentsAustraliaHumansInterviews as Topiccommercial determinants of healthfinancializationfood systemsinvestment policy and practicepower

Identifiers

PMID40208187
PMCPMC11983682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.