ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article explores the intersection of financialization and the commercial determinants of health (CDoH), with a focus on Australian food systems. While existing research highlights the food industry's role in shaping dietary patterns and health outcomes, the financial sector's influence on food systems governance remains underexamined. By investigating key actors in food systems investment policy and practice and the types of power they wield, this study contributes to a growing body of literature on CDoH. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with financial (e.g. investment banks and assets managers) and non-financial (e.g. food industry, government, and civil society) actors in Australia. Applying Moon's expanded power typology, we examined how financial and non-financial actors influence food systems investment, the disruptive potential of the financial sector on established power dynamics, and implications for the healthfulness of food environments. Our results identified economic power as the foundation of influence, but network and expert power were seen as critical, especially for financial actors to get deals done. Financial actors, including the 'responsible investment' sector, were perceived as potentially disrupting traditional power dynamics dominated by transnational food companies. Financial norms and practices manifested differently among different actors and areas of food systems. Governments were viewed as largely absent, with calls for them to articulate a clear investment policy vision to guide healthier food systems. This study provides novel insights into financial sector involvement in food systems, the disruption of traditional power dynamics, and opportunities for healthier food systems while also raising risks for increased market concentration through financialization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.