ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2025
Feasibility of Noncontrast 3D MR Angiography on a Commercial Wide-Bore 0.55-T System: Comparison with 1.5-T MR Angiography.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mid-Field Cardiovascular MRI in Class III Obesity.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Golden Angle Spiral Real-Time Phase Contrast MRI at 0.55T: A Single-Center Prospective Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate a noncontrast electrocardiographically triggered, navigator-gated, three-dimensional, balanced steady-state free precession MR angiography (MRA) research sequence on a wide-bore 0.55-T commercial low-field-strength system, by comparing image quality and aortic dimension measurements against images obtained at 1.5 T. Materials and Methods Ten healthy volunteers (28.8 years ± 9.0 [SD]; four male) and 10 participants being evaluated for dilated thoracic aorta (53.6 years ± 10.7; six male) underwent noncontrast MRA scans at both 1.5 T and 0.55 T. Overall image quality, intrarater and interrater agreement in aortic dimensions, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated between field strengths for both groups of individuals using Wilcoxon test, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plots. Results Median image quality scores remained comparable between volunteers and participants across field strengths. Blood signal variability was greater at the ascending aorta at 1.5 T for volunteers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.