ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2025
Stenting Versus Non-stenting Strategy in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Anterior Ischemic Stroke Patients with Tandem Occlusion.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe optimal endovascular treatment (EVT) strategy for acute tandem occlusion patients has not been decided yet, and a knowledge gap still exists in the literature. Therefore, we aimed to compare the two different interventional strategies, stenting and non-stenting, for the treatment of acute tandem occlusion patients.
methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study, which was conducted in a tertiary referral center. We reviewed all acute stroke patients between January 2016 and January 2024. We assessed the effects of the two strategies, stenting and non-stenting, on seven outcome measures, namely: hemorrhagic transformation after EVT, number of days in the neurology intensive care unit (N-ICU), number of days in the hospital, in-hospital mortality, functional outcome at discharge, 3-month functional outcome, and 3-month mortality.
resultsWe included 54 acute tandem occlusion patients who were treated with EVT in the study. Thirty-five (64.8%) patients underwent emergency carotid stenting during EVT and 19 patients (35.2%) did not receive emergency carotid stenting. Hemorrhagic transformation after EVT, number of days in N-ICU, number of days in the hospital, in-hospital mortality, functional outcome at discharge, and 3-month functional outcome did not differ between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Emergency stenting during EVT significantly reduced the probability of 3-month mortality (odds ratio = 0.21, confidence interval: 0.04 to 0.96, P = 0.04).
conclusionsThis study showed that emergency stenting in the acute tandem occlusion patients decreased the probability of mortality. Further research is needed on this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.