Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207935›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Single Enema Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Cats With Chronic Enteropathy.

Dimitra A Karra, Jan S Suchodolski, Shelley J Newman, Evgenia Flouraki, Jonathan A Lidbury, Joerg M Steiner, Panagiotis G Xenoulis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitra A KarraClinic of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-7816
Jan S SuchodolskiGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2176-6932
Shelley J NewmanNewman Specialty VetPath, New York, USA.
Evgenia FlourakiClinic of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece.
Jonathan A LidburyGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-4577
Joerg M SteinerGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-2086
Panagiotis G XenoulisClinic of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-0271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic enteropathies (CE) are common in cats, and alterations of the intestinal microbiota might be involved in the pathogenesis. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of a single enema fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in improving intestinal dysbiosis and clinical scores in cats with CE. ANIMALS: Twenty-eight cats with either chronic inflammatory enteropathy (CIE; n = 19) or small cell gastrointestinal lymphoma (SCGL; n = 9) were prospectively enrolled.

methodsEleven cats were randomly selected to receive a single enema FMT (FMT-group), and 17 cats were used as controls. Clinical activity was determined using the Feline Chronic Enteropathy Activity Index (FCEAI), and intestinal dysbiosis was determined using the feline dysbiosis index (DI) on the day of FMT (T0) and 30 days after FMT (T1).

resultsAt T0, 14/28 cats had an abnormal DI > 0. No significant difference was found in the DI from T0 to T1 in the FMT group (mean[SD]: 0.01[2.5] vs. 0.7[2.1]; p = 0.47). No significant difference was found in the DI between the FMT group and the control group at T1 (mean[SD]: -0.7[2.1] vs. 0.8[1.8]; p = 0.92). FCEAI significantly decreased at T1 compared to T0 in the FMT group (median[IQR] 10.0[7.7-11.3] vs. 4.5[4-5]; p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in the FCEAI between the FMT group and the control group at T1 (median[IQR] 4.5[4-5] vs. 4[3-5.75]; p = 0.64).

conclusionsIn this study, single enema FMT did not lead to a significant improvement in DI or FCEAI in cats with CE compared to controls.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesEnemaFecal Microbiota TransplantationIntestinal DiseasesAnimalsCatsChronic DiseaseDysbiosisFemaleMaleProspective StudiesCIEfelineFMTlymphoma

Identifiers

PMID40207935
PMCPMC11983779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.