Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207841›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2025

High-Intensity Gait Training for Patients After Stroke: A Feasibility Study.

Iris Charlotte Brunner, Gunhild Mo Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iris Charlotte BrunnerHammel Neurocenter/Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7194-3087
Gunhild Mo HansenDepartment of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

Region Midtjyllands Sunhedsvidenskabelig Forskningsfond
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeApproximately two-thirds of stroke patients experience various levels of walking impairment that limit their participation in society. Mounting evidence suggests that gait training provided at high cardiovascular intensity with a focus on stepping practice improves gait function after stroke and is superior to lower intensity standard gait training. However, high intensity gait training (HIGT) is not widely applied. PURPOSE: With this study, we wanted to examine the feasibility of HIGT in a XXX neurorehabilitation hospital.

methodsA longitudinal cohort study with 15 patients participated in 2 weeks of HIGT with 3-5 sessions per week. HIGT was provided as part of standard physical therapy. The results included feasibility measures such as adherence and fidelity to treatment, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, gait assessments were performed before and after the intervention and heart rate and number of steps were monitored during the training sessions.

resultsEleven of the 15 patients were non-ambulatory or dependent on the support of two people at the start of HIGT. Adherence to treatment was good, with almost all (14/15) completing 8 sessions or more. No serious adverse events occurred. The target heart rate of > 60% of HR DISCUSSION: HIGT was feasible, well tolerated by the patients and could be provided within existing staffing levels. There were no serious adverse events, and all patients confirmed that they would recommend HIGT to a friend in the same situation.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicStroke RehabilitationAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionStrokeTreatment Outcomegait trainingphysiotherapyrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID40207841
PMCPMC11984070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.