ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Body mass index as a predictive factor for efficacy of adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients: A pooled analysis from adjuvant GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group and TRIO Translational Research in Oncology Group studies.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The gut microbiota-obesity axis in the pathogenesis and prognosis of breast cancer.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Longitudinal Changes in Body Composition and Fluid Distribution During Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Longitudinal Observational Study Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of encorafenib in untreated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in China.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Body mass index as a predictive factor for efficacy of adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients: A pooled analysis from adjuvant GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group and TRIO Translational Research in Oncology Group studies.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes reduce recurrence and death in early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients, but toxicity is a concern. Studies show conflicting results on the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes. Limited data exist on the efficacy of adjuvant taxanes among BMI categories and the impact of different taxane-based chemotherapies (paclitaxel vs. docetaxel) on disease recurrence. Here, we present a pooled analysis of 13,486 EBC patients treated with adjuvant anthracyclines ± taxanes from seven GEICAM and TRIO trials (1996-2008) conducted. Patients were classified into four BMI categories: normal (<25.0), overweight (25.0-29.9), obese (30.0-34.9), and severely obese (≥35.0). BMI was evaluated as a predictive factor for the efficacy and toxicity of taxane-based chemotherapy. Our results show the following findings: patients' distribution by BMI was 44% normal, 33% overweight, 16% obese, and 8% severely obese. Seventy-nine percent received taxane-based chemotherapy. Ten-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was 71%, 70%, 68%, and 64% for normal, overweight, obese, and severely obese patients, respectively. Obese and severely obese patients had significantly worse outcomes (HR 1.15 and 1.29, respectively). Invasive disease-free survival with docetaxel vs. non-docetaxel was significant in the normal BMI group, while iDFS with paclitaxel was significant in the obese group. Relevant toxicity was observed in 5%, 5.5%, 5.9%, and 9.3% of normal, overweight, obese, and severely obese patients who received docetaxel. In conclusion, heavier EBC patients had a worse prognosis with adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy. Normal BMI patients benefited more from docetaxel, while obese patients benefited more from paclitaxel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.