SynthesisInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Effectiveness of Suicide Prevention Programmes Among Adolescents and Sociocultural Adaptation of Programmes: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contextualisation of the safeTALK™ Suicide Prevention Program: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Self-harm and suicide prevention in humanitarian and fragile contexts: A systematic scoping review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide is a leading cause of adolescent death and is preventable through school-based programs. This review aimed to identify available suicide prevention programmes for adolescents, their contextualisation, and effects on suicidal behaviours, help-seeking, knowledge, attitude and coping. This review was conducted by searching four databases following PRISMA guidelines. Articles published till September 2023 were searched, and the search was re-run in June 2024. All types of studies conducted among adolescents, outside healthcare facilities and published in English were included. Studies that included adolescents with pre-existing mental health conditions, gender and sexual minority groups were excluded. Quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469637). A total of 53 of 3663 identified articles were included. There were 41 different suicide prevention programmes used across the 53 studies. Data extraction focused on author, published year, country, study aims, population, interventions, comparison groups, contextualisation and the outcomes of interventions. Most of the studies (64.2%) were conducted in the United States of America. Three studies mentioned the contextualisation of the programme without details. Of the studies measuring suicidal behaviours (82.1%), help-seeking (66.7%), knowledge (93.8%), attitude (81.8%) and coping (50%), all reported on the effectiveness of programmes. Studies from low- and middle-income countries could not be identified, and very few studies mentioned the contextualisation of programmes. The heterogeneity of the studies and diversity of the programmes, tools, standards of delivery and follow-up times across the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions about the overall effectiveness of programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.