ArticleFreshwater science (Print)2024
Using models of local environmental conditions for biological assessment.
Article in Freshwater science (Print), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A model-based assessment of anthropogenic disturbance on lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common approach for biological assessment is to compare current observations of biota at a site to predictions of the biota that would occur if the site were in reference condition. To estimate these reference expectations, predictive bioassessment models use only data collected at reference sites and estimate relationships between biota and environmental variables that are unaffected by human activities (i.e., immutable variables). However, in some areas where human activities are pervasive, few reference sites are available. Here, we introduce a new approach for bioassessment, in which we first estimate relationships between widely available measurements of both immutable and human-influenced landscape variables and local environmental conditions (conductivity, dissolved total P, total suspended solids, percentage of sand and fines in the substrate, and dissolved organic C), and then we estimate the relationship between these local environmental variables and total macroinvertebrate richness. We then calculate the values of the local environmental variables under reference conditions by adjusting predictors that are strongly influenced by human activities to levels that are consistent with those observed at reference sites. Reference values of local environmental variables are then combined with the model for taxon richness to calculate taxon richness expected under reference conditions. Predictions of total taxon richness in validation data using the new approach are similar in accuracy and precision as predictions calculated using a traditional approach that focuses only on reference site data. The new approach complements existing bioassessment methods by highlighting types of sites in which estimates of reference expectations are uncertain and by improving our understanding of how instream stressors affect expected total taxon richness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.