ReviewiScience2025
Comprehensive review of non-invasive-treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity in breast cancer.
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Integrated care for long-responder women with metastatic breast cancer: Expert opinion for long term management in spain].Atencion primaria · 2026Guideline
- Pan-cancer expression, methylation, and prognostic significance of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in tumor immunology.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Quercetin Activates NRF2/SLC7A11/GPX4 Signaling to Restore Mitochondrial Function Inhibit Ferroptosis Thereby Alleviating Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Cardiac Modulation byCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Research Advances on Targets and Mechanisms in Cancers Complicated by Cardiovascular Diseases.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular toxicity is a significant side effect of breast cancer treatment and has emerged as a leading cause of non-tumor-related deaths among breast cancer survivors, emphasizing the critical need for effective monitoring and management of these complications. As breast cancer remains the most prevalent cancer among women, advancements in survival rates have been achieved through treatments such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the cardiovascular toxicity mechanisms associated with both established and emerging breast cancer therapies, identifies potential therapeutic targets and monitoring strategies, and highlights key deficiencies and challenges in the field. By offering insights into the early detection, prevention, and management of cardiovascular complications, this review aims to guide future research directions and clinical practices, ultimately improving outcomes for breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.