SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Tislelizumab efficacy and safety compared to other anti-PD-1s: a network meta-analysis of first-line therapies for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative safety profiles of first-line immunotherapy regimens in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis focusing on toxicity stratification.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Molecular mechanisms, current therapeutics, and emerging strategies in esophageal cancer: A comprehensive review.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in paclitaxel-mediated remodeling of the gastric cancer immune microenvironment and sensitization to immune checkpoint inhibitors via cGAS-STING pathway activation triggered by mtDNA release: challenges and translational perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Garcinoic acid promotes ferroptosis-associated growth inhibition in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through an MDM2-associated mechanism.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and fluorouracil-based agents as second-line therapy in biliary tract cancers.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Do ethnic differences influence the response to immunotherapy in advanced cervical cancer?Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- PD-L1-targeted photodynamic therapy orchestrates checkpoint blockade and immunogenic cell death for synergistic cancer immunotherapy.Redox biology · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a prognostic nomogram for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Mast cell driven immunometabolism as a therapeutic entry point in ESCC.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Beyond Structure: The Dynamic Role of the Extracellular Matrix Components in Immune Evasion.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Review
- Validation and refinement of the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive IMRT or chemo-IMRT: a Chinese multi-institutional retrospective study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Treatment efficacy of first-line immunotherapy in advanced esophageal small cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and identify factors influencing efficacy through a meta-analysis of multiple phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases. Two researchers independently extracted trial data, including efficacy-related outcomes such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), along with their subgroup data and safety-related indicators. The overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for OS and PFS, while the overall odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were computed for ORR to compare the classification and predictive abilities of combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS) for PD-L1 status. Additionally, survival outcomes across different subgroups were evaluated to explore the potential influencing factors for the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in ESCC. Results: This meta-analysis included eight phase 3 RCTs encompassing 4,479 participants. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved OS ( Conclusions: This study confirms that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy provides significant clinical benefits in ESCC. CPS =10 serves as a key threshold for predicting treatment response. There is a trend suggesting that male, Asian, smoking, and liver metastasis patients may experience better survival benefits, while no significant difference was observed between TP- and FP-based regimens. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024536221.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.