Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207226›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei Ren, Hanyu Zhang, Yixin Li, Wu Sun, Hexiang Peng, Huangda Guo, Tianjiao Hou, Mengying Wang, Zhendong Hu, Tao Wu and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mast cell driven immunometabolism as a therapeutic entry point in ESCC.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wei RenThe Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Hanyu ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yixin LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wu SunThe Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Hexiang PengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Huangda GuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Tianjiao HouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Mengying WangKey Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Zhendong HuDepartment of Esophageal Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Tao WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Baorui LiuThe Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and identify factors influencing efficacy through a meta-analysis of multiple phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases. Two researchers independently extracted trial data, including efficacy-related outcomes such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), along with their subgroup data and safety-related indicators. The overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for OS and PFS, while the overall odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were computed for ORR to compare the classification and predictive abilities of combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS) for PD-L1 status. Additionally, survival outcomes across different subgroups were evaluated to explore the potential influencing factors for the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in ESCC. Results: This meta-analysis included eight phase 3 RCTs encompassing 4,479 participants. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved OS ( Conclusions: This study confirms that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy provides significant clinical benefits in ESCC. CPS =10 serves as a key threshold for predicting treatment response. There is a trend suggesting that male, Asian, smoking, and liver metastasis patients may experience better survival benefits, while no significant difference was observed between TP- and FP-based regimens. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024536221.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorcombined positive scoreesophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapymeta-analysisPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40207226
PMCPMC11979238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.