ReviewFree neuropathology2025
Selective cellular and regional vulnerability in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a scoping review.
Review in Free neuropathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic thermodynamic-informational entropic relationship (TIER) models of selective vulnerability to neurodegeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neurotoxic mechanisms of cadmium in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- From Early Adversity to Neurodegeneration: Stress Biomarkers as Predictive Signals for Lifespan Brain Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three main types of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by the accumulation of abnormal proteins, namely tau, TDP-43 and FUS. The distribution of these proteins within different human brain regions is well known, as is the range of morphological variability of the cellular inclusions they form. Compared to the extensive knowledge that exists about distinct protein aggregates in FTLD, surprisingly little is known about the specific cell (sub)types that these inclusions affect. Even less is known about disease-specific abnormalities other than protein inclusions in affected and unaffected areas. These are non-trivial knowledge gaps. First, knowing which cell subtypes are vulnerable or resilient to the development of pathological protein inclusions is crucial to understand the cellular disease mechanisms. Second, mounting evidence suggests that non-cell autonomous mechanisms may play important roles in neurodegenerative conditions. For example, astrocytic tau pathology is associated with synaptic loss in corticobasal degeneration but not in progressive supranuclear palsy. Furthermore, changes that are more difficult and time-consuming to quantify, for example loss of a specific neuronal subtype that does not develop pathological inclusions, remain virtually unexplored and their relevance for disease progression are unknown. This scoping review is an attempt to collate all histological evidence from human studies that address the question of cell-specific vulnerability in the most common FTLD subtypes. By taking a systematic approach including various brain cell types such as neurons and their subtypes as well as astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocytes and the entire central nervous system with its affected and unaffected regions, this review summarizes the current status in the field and highlights important knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.