Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207177›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024

Exploring the Impact of 3D Fast Spin Echo and Inversion Recovery Gradient Echo Sequences Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition on Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Mana Moassefi, Shahriar Faghani, Sara Khanipour Roshan, Gian Marco Conte, Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad Mousavi, Timothy J Kaufmann, Bradley J Erickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mana MoassefiMayo Clinic Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Shahriar FaghaniMayo Clinic Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sara Khanipour RoshanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Gian Marco ConteMayo Clinic Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad MousaviMayo Clinic Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Timothy J KaufmannDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Bradley J EricksonMayo Clinic Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a study comparing the performance of automated segmentation techniques using 2 different contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition protocol. Patients and Methods: We collected 100 preoperative glioblastoma (GBM) MRIs consisting of 50 IR-GRE and 50 3-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) image sets. Their gold-standard tumor segmentation mask was created based on the expert opinion of a neuroradiologist. Cases were randomly divided into training and test sets. We used the no new UNet (nnUNet) architecture pretrained on the 501-image public data set containing IR-GRE sequence image sets, followed by 2 training rounds with the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE images, respectively. For each patient, in the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE test sets, we had 2 prediction masks, one from the model fine-tuned with the IR-GRE training set and one with 3D-FSE. The dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the 2 sets of results for each case in the test sets were compared using the Wilcoxon tests. Results: Models trained on 3D-FSE images outperformed IR-GRE models in lesion segmentation, with mean DSC differences of 0.057 and 0.022 in the respective test sets. For the 3D-FSE and IR-GRE test sets, the calculated Conclusion: Including 3D-FSE MRI in the training data set improves segmentation performance when segmenting 3D-FSE images.

Identifiers

PMID40207177
PMCPMC11975840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.