ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
The Development and Performance of a Machine-Learning Based Mobile Platform for Visually Determining the Etiology of 5 Penile Diseases.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of AI in Identification of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Anogenital Dermatoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma, from imaging, molecular biomarkers to multimodal AI: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Synergistic pairing of synthetic image generation with disease classification modeling permits rapid digital classification tool development.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a machine-learning visual classification algorithm for penile diseases in order to address disparities in access to sexual health services. Patients and Methods: We developed an image data set using original and augmented images for 5 penile diseases: herpes lesions, syphilitic chancres, balanitis, penile cancer, and genital warts. We used a U-Net architecture model for semantic pixel segmentation into background or subject image, an Inception-ResNet version 2 neural architecture to classify each pixel as diseased or nondiseased, and a salience map using GradCAM++. We trained the model on a random 91% sample of the images and evaluated the model on the remaining 9%, assessing recall (or sensitivity), precision, specificity, and F1-score. As of July 1st 2022, the model has been in use via a mobile application platform; we assessed application usage between July and October 1, 2023. Results: Of 239 images in the validation data set, 45 (18.8%) were of genital warts, 43 (18%) were of herpes simplex virus infection (ranging from early vesicles to ulcers), 29 (12.1%) were of penile cancer, 40 (16.7%) were of balanitis, 37 (15.5%) were of syphilitic chancres, and 45 (18.8%) were nondiseased images. The overall accuracy of the model for correctly classifying images was 0.944. There were 2640 unique submissions to the mobile platform; among a random sample (n=437), 271 (62%) were from the United States, 64 (14.6%) from Singapore, 41 (9.4%) from Canada, 40 (9.2%) from the United Kingdom, and 21 (4.8%) from Vietnam. Conclusion: We report on the development of a machine-learning model for classifying 5 penile diseases, which exhibited excellent performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.