Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Gender differences in attentional processes and attractiveness evaluation models during gait observation.

Hiroko Tanabe, Kota Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Psychological Nature of Female Gait Attractiveness.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiroko TanabeGraduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kota YamamotoSchool of Humanities, Hokusei Gakuen University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in building interpersonal relationships and in daily communication. Attractiveness is perceived through nonverbal information regarding one's morphological features, posture, movement, and behavior. Selective pressures throughout our species' evolutionary history have shaped sex differences in the evaluation of physical attractiveness. However, research on the process of body attractiveness perception has been limited to static information involving body images. Therefore, a better understanding of the attractiveness perception process in the real world requires an appreciation of the attractiveness perception mechanism of physical movement. Methods: This study examined the attractiveness perception of 30-s walking animations, as well as gender differences in gaze behavior and statistical models of attractiveness evaluation. We recruited 16 men and 17 women and made gender comparisons of fixation ratio to each gaze area (head, trunk, hip, leg, and others). Furthermore, the standardized estimates of the statistical models were qualitatively compared between male and female observers. Results: Male observers were highly fixated on the walkers' trunk, whereas female observers tended to shift their attention from the trunk to the legs, especially when observing high-preference animations. The statistical model for attractiveness evaluation, which used gait parameters for each gender, showed the tendency that when assessing attractiveness, male observers placed greater weight on the walkers' trunk silhouette, whereas female observers prioritized parameters requiring whole-body observation. Discussion: Gender differences in gaze behavior were observed in the assessment and perception of human movement attractiveness; such differences may reflect the evaluation model for each gender. The results suggest that men assess female gait attractiveness based on observations of the reproductive regions of the female body. In contrast, women perceive other women as potential competitors and assess female gait attractiveness based on beauty standards, which are shaped by sociocultural environments and the walker's psychological state. Our findings are the first step toward understanding the process of perceiving the attractiveness of physical movement and are expected to help generate attractive biological motions.

Indexed as

attractiveness perceptiongaitgait animationgaze behaviorgender differencesphysical attractiveness

Identifiers

PMID40207116
PMCPMC11979721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.